Thursday, October 18, 2007

Dr. James Watson calls Blacks inferior

This is an excerpt of a post and the comment I made at Black & White Blog where I am co-author. I invite you to see the original post and leave comments on either blog.

With great sadness I have to say that ignorance pervades even at the top of the scientific community. There is no excuse for the words of Dr. James Watson. They are blatant, racist, and ill-informed at the least. But historically, this is an argument that has long persisted.

Perhaps all those that continue the line of ill-reasoning stated by Dr. Watson as

“inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa ... because all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”

...

The part that truly worries me is that men of this type are the ones that led the cry for a master race. They ran experiments of the most inhumane nature, in the hopes of creating that race. And now there is Dr. Watson who is researching DNA, and god knows what his ultimate goal for this research may be. I can only hope there are several groups and individuals watching what he is up to.

As for your question:

“What if one race was scientifically inferior to another in terms of learning ability? Let’s say, for example, what if the black race was scientifically inferior and if that could be proved through a trusted scientific trial? Would blacks throughout the world accept it or would it be labeled as a racist trial?”

...

Actually there are 2 things you are incorrect about. The first is that African Americans do not “blame their woes” but rather highlight injustice and inequality in America that has been created and promoted through centuries of the existence of America.

More Here>

Monday, October 8, 2007

Which candidate matches your views?

This and more found at http://www.mvass.com and http://www.blackentertainmentblog.com

I found a very interesting Presidential candidate selector. There are more than just a few questions. Many I found though provoking and are questions I wish there was more discussion about. This list included one particular question I never see asked on breakdowns like this, Reparations. But it also includes immigration, social security, the candidate’s ages, marital status, national healthcare and other issues.

I won’t say that you should or should not vote for anyone that pops up for you. I won’t say that this list is who I would vote for. But I am presenting what my results were. I found the rankings to be interesting and a touch surprising.

Another nice thing is that this list includes those that have dropped out of the race, recent additions and a couple of top names that are not running but have drawn interest from the media and pundits.

Try it out for yourself. Oh one thing though, there is a huge ad that pops up before you get your results. But you can go past that ad to get to your results without a problem or searching for a way to get it off. I can’t blame the site for the ad; hey we all need to make money right?

You can try your hand at the selector here http://www.selectsmart.com/president/2008.html and you can see the side by side comparison of candidates here http://selectsmart.com/president/2008/comparethem.html.

My results:

    2008 President Selector Rankings

      1. Theoretical Ideal Candidate (100 %)
      2. Duncan Hunter (68 %)
      3. Chuck Hagel (not running) (65 %)
      4. Alan Keyes (64 %)
      5. Sam Brownback (64 %)
      6. Tom Tancredo (63 %)
      7. Newt Gingrich (says he will not run) (58 %)
      8. Jim Gilmore (withdrawn) (58 %)
      9. Mitt Romney (56 %)
      10. John McCain (56 %)
      11. Fred Thompson (51 %)
      12. Ron Paul (48 %)
      13. Tommy Thompson (withdrawn) (48 %)
      14. Mike Huckabee (48 %)
      15. Kent McManigal (campaign suspended) (40 %)
      16. Rudolph Giuliani (38 %)
      17. Al Gore (not announced) (37 %)
      18. Wesley Clark (not running, endorsed Clinton) (30 %)
      19. Bill Richardson (29 %)
      20. Joseph Biden (26 %)
      21. Hillary Clinton (25 %)
      22. Christopher Dodd (24 %)
      23. John Edwards (24 %)
      24. Barack Obama (22 %)
      25. Dennis Kucinich (22 %)
      26. Michael Bloomberg (says he will not run) (22 %)
      27. Mike Gravel (19 %)
      28. Alan Augustson (campaign suspended) (11 %)
      29. Elaine Brown (11 %)